Title IV-D and Non IV-D Common Sense Education 101

The Office of Child Support works under two subparts: Welfare and Non-Welfare. The welfare is known as Title IV-D cases, which are authorized for FFP, Financial Federal Participation pursuant to Public Law 93-647 which Congress authorized for FFP funds to Prevent, Reduce, and Eliminate the need for children and vulnerable adults to be forced into seeking Welfare Assistance from the State and funded by the Federal Government, meaning public taxpayers dollars. 

The Office of Child Support for the State of Georgia and the State of Vermont, claimed, via the pleadings filed in the Vermont Superior Court as well as evidenced on the Vermont District Court docket demonstrating that Adam Todd George, private individual who claims custodial parents rights and Kristen Vanckren, Vermont Office of Child Support Attorney for civil contempt against alleged non-custodial parents, that the Cost associated with such alleged enforcement had been non-title IV-D. This was anything but true according to the logged financial records filed with the Federal Office of Child Support, ("Evidence of Intent of OCS to Defraud Federal FFP Funds"). 

The State according to the Federal records demonstrates the State was provided financial reimbursement for the cost associated with the alleged enforcement against, Bahji Adams, on behalf of while not on behalf of Adam Todd George, who makes upward of a six-figure salary who somehow is a welfare recipient, Title IV-D. At the same time, they claim he is not a Title IV-D welfare recipient and able to access the office of child support pursuant to such regulations, federal rules of Title IV-D funds.  The Federal Office of Child Support, public disclosure for Non-IV-D Costs for the Five Consecutive Fiscal Years in 2012 - 2016 states that both Georgia and Vermont had no cost associated with Non-Title IV-D caseloads. This means that even though Adam Todd George is not authorized in accordance with governing law due to his financial status, as he is not in "need" or in "poverty", the Office of Child Support was including the "cost" associated with them "not" representing him while, "representing" him at the same time in order to seek FFP funds for any alleged enforcement measures against Bahji Adams to be reimbursed by federal funding. 

The OSCE clarifies, exactly what Bahji argued in the federal court which the State does not serve the alleged custodial parent, in this case, it serves the State, the public interest and the minor child's interest regarding the economic, mental, emotional, and physical well-being of both parents. Meaning, the State's interest at no time aligned with the alleged custodial parent, Adam Todd George, it aligned with the interest of Bahji Adams, the alleged non-custodial parent who was being unlawfully reduced and forced into welfare. They knowingly placed her under duress, subjecting her to distress, which is the social trend of declaring paper wars, domestic terrorism, inflicting terror upon Bahji's and the minor child's Constitutional Rights of which enslaved her to no end. This is demonstrated by the words of the OCSE own language for clarification, "IV-D services in non-AFDC cases that the State attorney does not "represent" the parent, and that, in the case of a conflict between the interests of the State, and those of the parent, the IV-D attorney will represent the State. As a practical matter, it is advisable for IV-D attorneys to notify any parent on whose behalf a case is worked that the attorney represents the State. The attorney may wish to provide examples to inform the parent of the implications of that fact (no attorney/client relationship is formed between them). Should a judge or judicial officer inquire about the attorney's "client" the attorney may wish to politely inform the judge that the "client" is in fact the State". 

The interest of the State is to act in accordance with Public Law, Pub.L.93647 which reads codified under 42 1347, "SEC. 2001. For the purpose of encouraging each State, as far practicable under the conditions in that State, to furnish services directed at the goal of— " (1) achieving or maintaining economic self-support to prevent, reduce, or eliminate dependency, "(2) achieving or maintaining self-sufficiency, including reduction or prevention of dependency, "(3) preventing or remedying neglect, abuse, or exploitation of children and adults unable to protect their own interests, or preserving, rehabilitating, or reuniting families, "(4) preventing or reducing inappropriate institutional care by providing for community-based care, home-based care, or other forms of less intensive care, or "(5) securing referral or admission for institutional care when other forms of care are not appropriate, or providing services to individuals in institutions, there is authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year a sum sufficient to carry out the purposes of this title. The sums made available under this section shall be used for making payments to States under section 2002."

In every facet, Bahji's interest and the interest of the minor child on behalf of his mother, aligned with what was required to be the actions of the State interest, this brings about the fact of the clear intent of Kristen and Adam Todd George to use the powers granted to the Office of Child support for private personal profit, abusing the power invested to the State office, placing Bahji under abuse of color of law.

In 2016, the Vermont Superior Court finally stopped the Office of Child Support abuse directed at Bahji Adams, liberty, life, in some facets by placing an Order in the Court record "stopping", by "withdrawal" and "termination" of the alleged Child Support "services" and alleged "enforcement" which had taken place over the last 12 plus years, in the Courts and outside of the Courts. The State of Georgia, released the "lein" they had against Bahji's "tax-returns" in 2017, January, several months after the Vermont Superior Court Order which released the Office of Child Support Programs from providing "services" to "either party". All while both states, refused to perform in accordance with federal clarification and request made by Bahji showing: "There is no conflict in the government attorney advocating a reduction in child support payments pursuant to his statutory duties", as clarified by the Federal Office of Child Support." 

Meanwhile, Kristen Vanckren, Office of Child Support for the State of Vermont, In October of 2017, is informing via email, that, such events in the Vermont Superior Court, did not transpire and is requiring the employer, SouthWest Airlines, Inc., at that time to continue with the IWO, Income Withholding Order, a known administrative service, to be provided on behalf of Adam George. This action not only violated the State Court Order, which terminated services to Adam Todd George, but also the federal rules of regulations to case-closure, as well as Bahji's several fundamental rights to equal access to the laws in multiple facets, thus amounting to terrorism against Bahji's basic humanity and liberty interest, via paper filings , attitudes, and actions taken in stark contrast to clearly established rights and laws Bahji had rights to participate in and exercise. Specifically what the Federal Office of Child Support clarifies on their website:

"Consequently, it is conceivable that an absent parent may request a review to obtain a reduction in the amount of child support previously ordered. In addition, if appropriate, the State must adjust the order in accordance with State guidelines for setting child support award amounts." OCSE, further clarifies, "If States are unbiased in the application of child support guidelines, then they should proceed with a review in all eligible cases regardless of the nature of the request or the anticipated outcome."

Vermont Office of Child Support Order 2016 Termination of Services

Congressional Enactment of Pub.L.93-647

Evidence of Intent of OCS to Defraud Federal FFP Funds

Explaining NON-Title IV-D and Title IV-D Child Support cases

Federal OCSE Clarification individuals Served

The Poverty Industry Book Link

https://titleivd.blogspot.com/2019/06/statements-of-financial-papers-for-all.html

https://titleivd.blogspot.com/2019/06/by-thousand-paper-cuts-truth-is-hidden.html

https://titleivd.blogspot.com/2019/06/title-iv-d-state-actors-using-ffp-funds.html

Abide in Silence

YouTube Videos on Title IV-A/D

Turner v. Rogers Oral Argument