Title IV-D State Actors using FFP Funds to Declare War on Parents

Title IV-D programs are granted FFP Funds and State Actors are using those funds to declare a paper war on parents regarding child support. The United States Supreme Court, Turner, to be exact, the highest law of the Land, said that behavior is a "no, no", in not so many words. The Executive Branches Judicial Branch clarified and codified into law that "critical issue" regarding an alleged non-custodial parents ability for "compliance" is fundamental to procedural and substantive governing laws. The following attachment was filed in the Federal Court of Vermont regarding the Title IV-D programs actions which used two State Agencies and two State Courts to unlawfully kidnap, via the War on Paper to implement terror in the unlawful restraint of Adams ability to retain her liberty and began the kidnapping of her financial, emotional, mental, and ultimately physical bodies for purpose of financial gain by the State Agencies and Adam Todd George.  

The Second Circuit refused to hear the issue of if alleged non-custodial parents are authorized by federal laws, statutory enacted by Congressional authority to have equal access to the Office of Child Support Programs and Services, which include the alleged right to modification for child support the alleged non-custodial parent is unable to comply with. 

The Motion for Rule 62.1 Indicative Ruling on Motion for Relief and Judicial Notice demonstrates the groupthink by the State actors to continually deny Adams relief of modification and access to alleged visitation with her minor child. She has not had the ability to foster a relationship with her minor child for multiple years. This is provided for educational purpose to awaken the public to the current state of affairs governing the U.S.A which is becoming and transcending into the "US" of the individual "A" where greed is rewarded and telling the "truth" is punished as a criminal act, eroding all reason and fundamental principles of American society. This culture is brainwashed, hypnotized, and fast asleep, and only through educating the public about Title IV-A Social Security Act loans to states which administers the child support pursuant to Title IV-D authority will anything transcend.

The following pleading addresses equal access to the programs and services of the Office of Child Support, modification of child support and equal access to the Office of Child Support Programs, it does not challenge any alleged Child Support Order, nor does it claim any lawful child support orders entered in accordance with any governing law. It does demonstrate the Ponzi scheme being enacted by actors using State-Federal Co-operative agencies in a concerted effort to destroy non-custodial parents lives, and what the FBI terms, "kidnapping" by using simulating legal process for unlawful abuse.


PDF of paperwar
Turner v. Rogers Oral Arugement